?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Kids @ Cons - The Poll! - Danny Danger Oz — LiveJournal [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Kids @ Cons - The Poll! [Jan. 27th, 2010|04:44 pm]
dalekboy
[Tags|, , ]
[mood |thoughtfulthoughtful]



Note! This poll is about negative impact of experience!

Poll #1517139 Annoying people at cons

A child (someone else's) has seriously impacted on my enjoyment of a con or fannish event...

almost every time
4(4.5%)
frequently
4(4.5%)
now and again
22(25.0%)
rarely
38(43.2%)
never
20(22.7%)

An adult has seriously impacted on my enjoyment of a con or fannish event...

almost every time
15(17.0%)
frequently
26(29.5%)
now and again
35(39.8%)
rarely
11(12.5%)
never
1(1.1%)

Susan is genetically the Doctor's grand-daughter, and not in any way adopted!

Yes
29(34.5%)
No
8(9.5%)
Not sure
38(45.2%)
*ahem* I have a theory... *ahem* *ahem*
9(10.7%)
linkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: tikiwanderer
2010-01-27 11:10 am (UTC)
What an idiot! I so totally get the need to relax, and the desire to have time for/with some hobby you love, but a con is not free childcare! And something that comes from the primitive survival and wilderness stuff I've done - if you want your child to come home alive, there must always be exactly one person assigned to be responsible for the child and know exactly where they are at any moment. All the accidents, lost children and other fatal or near-fatal mishaps happen when every adult thinks the child is being supervised by someone else. A con isn't going to suddenly throw up a wild human-flesh-eating predator (you hope), but the same principle applies if you want basic safety: there must always be one person supervising.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)