?

Log in

No account? Create an account
For those wanting a taster... - Danny Danger Oz — LiveJournal [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

For those wanting a taster... [Jan. 3rd, 2010|02:33 pm]
dalekboy
[Tags|]
[mood |tiredtired]

Here's the teaser for the upcoming Matt Smith series of Doctor Who.

linkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: mrs_roy
2010-01-03 09:56 am (UTC)
Tell that to casting .. besides if that were the case, why have each incarnation become seemingly younger .. Don't mistake me for a naive Tennant Doctor worshiper. I appreciate his relationship with Rose, I'm the first to admitt it, but I'm not ignorant.

Matt Smith might do wonders, but I wash my hands of the show.

Nobody will be as brilliant as Tom Baker ever was.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: angriest
2010-01-03 10:07 am (UTC)
There's not really a trend there. Once you take out Hartnell (55) and Smith (27), all the Doctors have been in their 30s or 40s.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: lauredhel
2010-01-07 04:40 pm (UTC)
ObTeenyNitpick: I believe Davison started just before he turned 30, didn't he?
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: angriest
2010-01-07 04:49 pm (UTC)
Ooh, pedantry! : )

I can't believe I just went and checked this. Peter Davison recorded the regeneration scene in "Logopolis, part 4" on 24 January 1981. He turned 30 on 13 April 1981. So yes, he was indeed only 29. For about 12 seconds of screentime. : )
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: ariaflame
2010-01-03 03:06 pm (UTC)
The story I heard was that they were actually looking for an older actor this time, but Matt's audition was so good that they couldn't not choose him just because he was younger than what they were looking for.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)