Log in

No account? Create an account
Danny Danger Oz [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Requests [Dec. 12th, 2009|08:57 am]
[mood |creativecreative]

Can you tell I was woken at stupid o'clock and haven't been able to get back to sleep?

Anyway, I have two requests.

1. Can anyone point me towards something I can embed in LJ that will play audio files when people click on it? Basically I'd like to be able to put up some select soundgrabs and such. So far my searches for something that would be quick and easy and free have amounted to nothing, but I'm not necessarily terribly awake or with it.

2. I'm looking for a Canberra (or nearby) based geek girl, preferably with a nice pair of geek girl glasses, for a photoshoot idea. Costume would ideally be fur bikini ala Raquel Welch in One Million B.C.. Is this you, or a friend? Contact me for details. No money, but a full set of photos from the shoot would be provided.

Would also be happy with the right looking geek boy, though he wouldn't be in a bikini, of course.

From: gutter_monkey
2009-12-12 04:26 am (UTC)
Melbourne based geek girls should contact me.

Not for a photo shoot, I'm just lonely. :)
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: dalekboy
2009-12-12 05:00 am (UTC)
See, while I want the geek girls for the shoot, I can still do what I want with the right geek boy.

You're just too picky!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: chuckmck1
2009-12-12 09:25 am (UTC)
Oooooooh! So many possible responses to this post, none of them even vagualy PC. Ahem. Need anyone to hold your lighting equipment, Danny? Or, y'know, oil the geek girls?
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: dalekboy
2009-12-12 09:57 am (UTC)
What lighting equipment? I'm a natural light kind of guy.

Besides, you're 700km away, and my thoughts re: fur bikinis is to go for fairly generous ones. After the effect more than titilation.

Actually, you'd be a good geek boy. Got any furry underpants?
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: chuckmck1
2009-12-12 10:04 am (UTC)
Have you *seen* me? I don't need no steenking furry undrpants - I'm hairy enough to pass for underpanted already!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: dalekboy
2009-12-12 10:17 am (UTC)
Yeah, I thought you might be, but I'm not sure I'm ready for Junior Chuck to be dangled freely in front of me :)

Speaking of another sort of Universal Horror, how goes the film watching?
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: chuckmck1
2009-12-12 10:28 am (UTC)
It's been a good week: we watched the Karloff version of The Mummy (which, honestly, bored us both somewhat), but Frankenstein Meets the Wolfman made up for it! I'm threatening 'no more monster flicks' until Max's behaviour improves (which hurts me as much as him), but I'm thinking Phantom of the Opera next. Or possibly Werewolf of London.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: chuckmck1
2009-12-12 10:29 am (UTC)
And OI! - I just got that 'Universal Horror' crack! How dare you post to me when I'm drunk and my guard is down!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: dalekboy
2009-12-12 11:56 am (UTC)
Don't remember seeing the UH Phantom, but I really enjoyed Werewolf of London. It has a fabulous transformation scene in it.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
(Deleted comment)
[User Picture]From: dalekboy
2009-12-12 10:57 pm (UTC)
Because he'd be in a loincloth of some description, and therefore topless!

And strangely, despite what people may assume about me, I wouldn't want my geek girl topless for the shoot. The central conceit is one that too much flesh would distract from, in most cases.

Sorry, semi-serious answer. Being tired, nauseaus, and headachey makes me that way.

I'll shut up now...
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: nicked_metal
2009-12-16 11:21 am (UTC)
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: dalekboy
2009-12-17 08:46 am (UTC)
Thank you!

Have sent her a message, will chat and see how we go.

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)