curiousNow it does present two sides of the argument, with a bunch of facts that I've seen several times before that ignore some things and concentrate on others - I'm used to that on the net. What I'm curious about is the use of language.
I would be genuinely interested in other people's perspectives on this. I'm curious to see whether or not other people find that the site presents its info with a subtle level of bias in the way it phrases things.
